Posts in Philosophy

Could God Be Amoral?

By William Lane Craig Aug. 26, 2016 9:00 a.m. Apologetics, Philosophy

Dear Dr. Craig

I've recently had my worldview shattered and pretty much torn apart by the natural arguments for the existence of God, the Kalam Cosmological argument, the Teleological argument, the Ontological argument, and a few others which you present in outstanding accuracy and clarity. Being 17 years old, as any other teenager I thought I had everything figured out, I had responses ready for every argument that could've threatened my atheist belief ...

Read More

Limited Atonement

By William Lane Craig Aug. 19, 2016 9:00 a.m. Apologetics, Philosophy

... In reading to try and find some answers, it happened that most of the resources on Penal Substitution are written from a reformed perspective, and my question is over your views on the extent of the atonement ...

Read More

A Review of "The Enduring Authority of the Christian Scriptures," ed. D.A. Carson

By Kenneth Berding Aug. 17, 2016 9:00 a.m. Apologetics, New Testament, Old Testament, Philosophy, Theology, Historical Theology

I have just finished reading through (most of) the new 1,200+ page book, The Enduring Authority of the Christian Scriptures, edited by D.A. Carson. This book is a splendid example of deep thinking about important subjects presented in a format readable not just for advanced students and scholars, but also for other deep-thinking Christians. I am not saying that the topics are simple. Quite to the contrary, this book tackles some of the most difficult questions surrounding the authority of Scripture. The doctrine of inerrancy in particular is underscored throughout the book ...

Read More

Gratuitous Evil and the Burden of Proof

By William Lane Craig Jul. 29, 2016 9:00 a.m. Apologetics, Philosophy

As I am transcribing your latest Defenders lectures on the problem of evil, I was hoping someone would ask the question, but I don't think it has been asked. So, maybe you can attend to it next week?

Instead of arguing that "even though some evils look gratuitous, they really aren't" (i.e. we can't discern what greater-good will come out of any evil - this greater-good could occur centuries later in another country), why not come up with an argument that says, yes, gratuitous evil does exist (since it seems more obvious than not that it does exist), but that that somehow doesn't refute God's existence?

Specifically, have you read Kirk MacGregor's response to the problem of evil and what are your thoughts? ...

Read More

Should We Think of Christ’s Death in Juridical Terms?

By William Lane Craig Jul. 22, 2016 9:00 a.m. Apologetics, Philosophy

Dr Craig

First and foremost, I would like to thank you for the significant impact that your ministry has had in the life of my family. My wife and I have been encouraged to share our faith with confidence knowing that we can provide a rational response to many of the objections that Christians face.

I have been a Christian for a majority of my life. However, my new found interest in apologetics has highlighted my considerable lack of knowledge with respect to the basics of the faith that I attempt to defend. As a result, I have started to study theology.

The question I have for you arises from my recent study on the atonement. Howard Marshall's Aspects of the Atonement (2007), was very helpful, and provided a solid defence of penal substitution. However, I have since developed doubts regarding this atonement metaphor ...

Read More

J.P. Moreland Answers Three Important Questions

By Sean McDowell Jul. 20, 2016 9:00 a.m. Apologetics, Ethics, Philosophy

In my recent book, A New Kind of Apologist, I was able to interview my friend and colleague J.P. Moreland. He is the distinguished professor of philosophy at Talbot School of   Theology and the author or coauthor of thirty books, including The Kingdom Triangle ...

Read More

What Does it Mean to Say God Is a Soul?

By William Lane Craig Jul. 15, 2016 9:00 a.m. Apologetics, Philosophy

I would like to ask a clarifying question, and also ask you to consider some implications of your view on the Trinity.

For reference sake, here is the view to which I'm referring: "Suppose, then, that God is a soul which is endowed with three complete sets of rational cognitive faculties, each sufficient for personhood. Then God, though one soul, would not be one person but three, for God would have three centers of self-consciousness, intentionality, and volition, as Social Trinitarians maintain. God would clearly not be three discrete souls because the cognitive faculties in question are all faculties belonging to just one soul, one immaterial substance. God would therefore be one being which supports three persons, just as our individual beings each support one person." ...

Read More

Page 1 of 21